Build / Codex / Production feed integration

How to Add a Production Feed Integration with Codex and Synorb

Use Codex when the task is production work inside an existing codebase: add the route, wire the UI, update docs, verify behavior, and keep the change easy to review. Synorb supplies the source-grounded feed layer.

Get Keys Copy prompt ↓
Build intent

What is this production feed integration supposed to do?

A production feed integration should fit the existing app: route names, env handling, data models, cache behavior, UI components, observability, and deployment process. It should not look like a throwaway prototype.

Existing-codebase route

Add a backend endpoint using local conventions and server-side Synorb credentials.

Existing UI

Wire source-linked feed rows into the current dashboard, app, or agent surface.

Verification

Use lightweight checks, smoke tests, or page probes without exposing credentials.

Codex fit

Why does Codex fit this build?

Codex fits when the builder wants careful changes across a real repository. It can inspect code, make scoped edits, run lightweight checks, and produce a PR that adds Synorb as a server-side content feed.

Builder surface
Codex builds the app layer
GoalProduction feed integration
OutputUI, routes, filters, states, and review workflow
Context layer
Synorb supplies source-grounded feeds
BuildMCP exploration where available
ShipREST from a backend route with server-side secrets
Starting scopes

Which Synorb feeds should this app start with?

Start narrow, prove the feed contract, then broaden coverage. These scopes give the coding agent concrete source-grounded examples to design against.

production app feeds

Use Synorb Streams and source-linked feed records to test this scope with source URLs, dates, tags, and coverage caveats preserved.

agent context routes

Use Synorb Streams and source-linked feed records to test this scope with source URLs, dates, tags, and coverage caveats preserved.

research dashboards

Use Synorb Streams and source-linked feed records to test this scope with source URLs, dates, tags, and coverage caveats preserved.

newsroom surfaces

Use Synorb Streams and source-linked feed records to test this scope with source URLs, dates, tags, and coverage caveats preserved.

operations dashboards

Use Synorb Streams and source-linked feed records to test this scope with source URLs, dates, tags, and coverage caveats preserved.

Architecture

Use the same safe data path.

1

Explore with an agent

If Codex or your companion coding agent supports MCP, inspect Synorb Streams and source-linked examples before generating the app. Otherwise use the REST docs and the sample row shape in the prompt.

2

Call Synorb from the backend

The shipped app should call Synorb REST from a server route, scheduled job, webhook receiver, or server function. Keep SYNORB_API_KEY and SYNORB_SECRET out of browser code.

3

Show citations and coverage

Every card should preserve source URL, source name, published date, tags, and an honest empty or limited-results state when the selected scope has few results.

One-shot prompt

Paste this into Codex.

This prompt is tuned to the build intent and keeps Synorb credentials server-side.

Production feed integration prompt

Asks for the app surface, backend feed route, source-linked rows, safe credential handling, and transparent coverage states.

Use Codex to add a production Synorb feed integration to this repository. First inspect the app framework, route conventions, environment handling, fetch helpers, UI components, docs, and existing verification scripts. Implement a server-only feed route that reads SYNORB_API_KEY and SYNORB_SECRET from server-side environment variables and calls POST https://api.synorb.com/streams/query. Return normalized rows with id, headline, summary, publishedDate, sourceUrl, sourceName, tags, significance, pagination, usage, and cacheAgeSeconds. Wire the route into the existing UI with source-linked cards and empty/error states. Add docs for provisioning credentials with curl -s https://synorb.com/connect. Run lightweight non-pytest checks appropriate to this repo and summarize exactly what changed.
FAQ

Questions builders ask.

Why use Codex for a Synorb integration?

Codex is useful when the integration needs scoped existing-codebase edits rather than a standalone prototype.

What should Codex verify?

Verify the route shape, env handling, UI rendering, source links, empty states, and any lightweight local checks available in the repo.

Where should Synorb credentials go?

They should live in server-side environment variables or secret stores, never browser code.

How should the PR describe the integration?

It should explain the backend route, normalized row shape, UI surface, cache behavior, and credential setup.

Connect

Want to test Synorb feeds for free?

Provision starter credentials, then keep REST credentials server-side in the app you build.

curl -s https://synorb.com/connect
Get Keys More examples →